← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/27394/2007closed

Mary Thomas v. State And Others

2015-06-04Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 27394 of 2007 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

------------- MARY THOMAS, AGED 55 YEARS, W/O. V.G.THOMAS, VELLEPARAMBIL, PUZHAKKARAPPADOM, EDAPPALLY SOUTH VILLAGE, VENNALA, COCHIN-28.

BY ADVS.SRI.MOHAN JACOB GEORGE SMT.P.V.PARVATHI SMT.REENA THOMAS SRI.L.RAM MOHAN.

RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. CORPORATION OF COCHIN, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

3. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, COCHIN CORPORATION, EDAPPALLY ZONAL OFFICE, ERNAKULAM.

4. SURVEY SUPERINTENDENT, RESURVEY DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM.

5. TALUK SURVEYOR, SURVEY DEPARTMENT, ERNAKULAM.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SHYSON P,.MANGUZHA & BY SRI.S.RAMESH BABU, S.C., COCHIN CORPN.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rvs.

WP(C).No. 27394 of 2007 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

----------------------- EXT. P1:

TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO.2848/1994.

EXT. P1(A):

TRUE COPY OF SALOE DEED NO. 3532/1991.

EXT. P1(B):- TRUE COPY OF SALE DEED NO.5544/2004.

EXT. P2:- TRUE COPY OF ROUGH SKETCH.

EXT. P2(A):- TRUE COPY OF ROUGH SKETCH.

EXT. P3:- TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 29/05/2007 OF THE SECOND RESPONDENT.

EXT. P4:- TRUE COPY OF NOTICE ISSUED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

---------------------- NIL.

/TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE RVS.

A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = W.P(C) No.27394 of 2007 = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Dated this the 4th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

Today when the matter came up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition can be closed leaving open the question relating to the right of the petitioner to be decided in appropriate proceedings. Recording the said submission, the writ petition is closed without prejudice. Sd/- A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE krj