← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22905/2013closed

Falcon Cashews v. Superintendent Of Police

2015-12-17Honourable The Chief Justice Mr.Ashok Bhushan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN THURSDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22905 of 2013 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

----------------------- FALCON CASHEWS CHAKKUVALLY, AMBALATHUMBHAGAM P.O., KOLLAM-690 520 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER G.SASIDHARAN PILLAI. BY ADVS.SRI.K.NIRMALAN SRI.A.RAJASIMHAN RESPONDNETS:

--------------------------

1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), KOLLAM-691 001.

2. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KARUNAGAPPALLY-690 518.

3. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SASTHAMCOTTA, KOLLAM-690 521.

4. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE SOORANAD POLICE STATION, KOLLAM-690 522.

5. A.RAHIM S/O MUHAMMED KUNJU RAVUTHAR, NALUTHUNDIL HOUSE PORUVAZHY, AMBALATHUMBHAGOM P.O., KOLLAM-690 520. R1-4 BY SR. GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. C.R. SYAMKUMAR R5 BY ADV. SRI.K.S.MANU (PUNUKKONNOOR) THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 22905 of 2013 (K) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 10.8.2013. EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 2.9.2013. EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 6.9.2013. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL // TRUE COPY // P.A. TO JUDGE sou.

ASHOK BHUSHAN, CJ & K. RAMAKRISHNAN., J -------------------------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 22905 of 2013 --------------------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of December, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ashok Bhushan, CJ.

This writ petition has been filed seeking police protection to run a cashew factory. This Court has already passed an interim order on 27.9.2013.

2. Learned Government Pleader submits that after filing of the writ petition, no untoward incident has been reported to police.

3. In the above view of the matter, we close the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to approach the police if any further cause of action arises.

Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN, CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- K. RAMAKRISHNAN JUDGE sou.21/12/15