The Corporate Manager v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2015/19TH CHAITHRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20490 of 2014 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- THE CORPORATE MANAGER ST.MARY'S GIRLS HIGH SCHOOL, PAYYANNUR KANNUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI. GRACIOUS KURIAKOSE(SR) SRI.GEORGE MATHEWS SRI.T.T.RAKESH RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REP. BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT TRIVANDRUM - 695 001.

2. THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

3. THE CABINET SUB COMMITTEE, REP. BY MINISTER FOR EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.

4. THE MANAGER, S.A.B.T.M.H.S.S., THAYINERI, PAYYANNUR KANNUR DISTRICT, 670 307.

R4 BY ADV. SRI.M.V.AMARESAN R4 BY ADV. SRI.PHILJO VARUGHESE PHILIPS R1 -R 3 BY ADV. SRI.K.A.JALEEL, ADDL. ADVOCATE GENERAL R BY SPL. GOVERNMENT PLEADER: ADV.SRI.T T MEHMOOD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-04-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 20490 of 2014 (I) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

----------------------- EXT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR MINORITY EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS DATED 20/6/2010. EXT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER NO.185/2013 DATED 11/6/2013.

EXT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION DATED 17/6/2014 OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT P4: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 20/6/2013 ALONG WITH RECEIPT EXT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE GOVERNMENT ORDER 143/2014 ALONG WITH RELEVANT ANNEXURES DATED 31/7/2014.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL True Copy/ P A to Judge

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

========================= W.P(C).No.20490 of 2014 ============================ Dated this the 09th day of April, 2015

JUDGMENT

Petitioner, claims to be a corporate manager, approached this Court aggrieved by non-sanctioning of plus two courses. Petitioner submits that overlooking the stipulations in the guidelines that corporate management should be given preference while granting plus two courses than the individual management, Government has accorded sanction to the 4th respondent. Petitioner submits that this is against Ext.P2 Government Order.

2.

The question is whether petitioner has been overlooked in the matter of sanctioning plus two courses has to be adverted by the Government.

3.

In that view of the matter, Government shall consider the matter after hearing the petitioner and 4th respondent. There shall be a direction to the first respondent to take appropriate decision within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

The Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.

Sbna/17/04/15