Fathima Bind Subair v. Supdt Of Police
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE TUESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/3RD AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20640 of 2014 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :- ----------------
1. FATHIMA BIND SUBAIR, AGED 23 YEARS D/O. SUBAIRKUTTY, PALLEEDE PADINJATTETHIL, PALLIMURI SOORANADU.P.O., KOLLAM-690 522.
2. SUBAIRKUTTY, S/O. MUHAMMED KUNJU, PALLEEDE PADINJATTATHIL PALLIMURI, SOORANADU.P.O., KOLLAM-690 522.
BY ADV. SRI.T.C.MOHANDAS RESPONDENT(S) :- ------------------
1. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL) KOTTARAKKARA, QUILON-691 506.
2. CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SOORANAD POLICE STATION, SOORANAD.P.O., QUILON-690 522.
3. KERALA STATE WAKF BOARD, REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, VIP ROAD KALOOR, COCHIN-682 017.
4. PORUVAZHY MAYYATHUMKARA SHAFI MAHAL MUSLIM JAMMATH REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PORUVAZHY.P.O.
KOLLAM-690 522.
5. ALIYAR KUNJU, S/O. VAVA KUNJU, PORUVAZHY.P.O, KOLLAM-690 522. R4 & R5 BY ADV. SRI.R.SURAJ KUMAR SRI.SUNIL J.CHAKKALACKAL SMT.V.BEENA SMT.V.DEEPA R1 & R2 BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.C.R.SYAMKUMAR R3 BY SRI.K.SHIBILI NAHA, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 24-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 20640 of 2014 (D) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :- --------------------------- EXT.P1. TRUE COPY OF ORDER DATED 1-8-2014 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P2. TRUE COPY OF THE PETITION DATED 7-8-2014 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE POLICE.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :- NIL ------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE
ASHOK BHUSHAN, C.J & A.M. SHAFFIQUE, J.
-------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20640 of 2014 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of November 2015
J U D G M E N T
Shaffique, J.
The petitioners have approached this Court seeking for police protection in relation to the marriage of the first petitioner, who is the daughter of the 2nd petitioner. An interim order had already been passed by this Court on 8.8.2014. 2.
It is submitted on either side that the marriage had already been solemnized.
3.
Under such circumstances, we do not think that any further direction is required to be passed in this writ petition. Other dispute, if any, between the parties can be agitated before appropriate forum.
Hence, this writ petition is closed.
Sd/- ASHOK BHUSHAN CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- A.M. SHAFFIQUE J UDGE Jvt/24.11.2015.