← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23148/2013disposed of

Jolly Varghese v. K S E Board

2015-06-26Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/5TH ASHADHA, 1937201 WP(C).No. 23148 of 2013 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ JOLLY VARGHESE, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O. P.V.VARKEY, PADINJATTIL HOUSE, PANDINJATTIL PLAZA, N H BYE PASS, GEETHANJALI JUNCTION, THAMMANAM P.O.

KOCHI-23.

BY ADV. SRI.INNOCENT FRANCIS PAPALI RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VAIDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM REP. BY ITS SECRETARY - 695 004.

2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL CIRCLE, K S E BOARD, POWER HOUSE ROAD, KOCHI - 682 018.

3. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER, TRNASMISSION CIRCLE, KALAMASSERY - 682 022.

4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL DIVISION, TRIPUNITHURA - 682 305.

5. ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SUB DIVISION, VYTTILA-682019.

6. KERALA STATE ELECTICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION C.V.RAMAN PILLAI ROAD, VELLAYAMBALAM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 685 010, REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN.

R-R6 BY ADV. SRI.ANEESH JAMES,SC,KSEB REGULATORY COM R1 -R 5 BY ADV. SRI.JAICE JACOB,SC,KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD R6 BY ADV. SRI.S.SUJIN, SC, ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION R BY SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 23148 of 2013 (P) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 :- A TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER NO DB 65/GEETHANJALI/09-10 DTD 8/3/2010 ISSUED BY 5TH RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER EXHIBIT P2 :- A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DTD 16/11/2009 IN OP 13/2009 ISSUED BY THE 6TH RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 23148 OF 2013 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 26th day of June, 2015

JUDGMENT

The liability to pay transmission side development charges has already been upheld by this court in a series of cases. No relief can be granted to the petitioner therefore. 2.

The petitioner is free to move the Consumer Grievance Redressal Forum if there is any other grievance. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd