T.V.Babu v. Chief General Manager,Sbi,Tvm.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/13TH ASWINA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.30893 of 2005 (C) ---------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
-------------------------- T.V.BABU, ASSISTANT MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, MANGALAPURAM BRANCH, TRIVANDRUM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.R.RAMADAS.
RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------
1. THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, S.S.KOVIL ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
2. THE GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, S.S.KOVIL ROAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.
3. THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA, ZONAL OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM. R1 TO 3 BY ADVS. SRI.P.G.PARAMESWARA PANICKER (SR.) SRI.P.GOPAL.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
W.P.(C).NO.30893 OF 2005-C APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- -------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19.7.2005 ISSUED BY THE BRANCH MANAGE,R SBI MANGALAPURAM BRANCH.
EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 22.1.2005.
EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.8.2005 IN WPC NO.2133/2005.
EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 6.10.2005 FROM THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER, SBI, ZONL OFFICE.
EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT AND LETTER DATED NIL. TO THE PETITIONER.
EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF S.B.I., ZONAL OFFICE TO THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------------ EXT.R1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE CIRCULAR NO.4(91-92) DATED 9.4.1991.
EXT.R1(b) TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.09.2005 OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
vku/- [ true copy ]
K. Vinod Chandran, J ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.30893 of 2005-C ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 05th day of October, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, an Assistant Manager in the Junior Management-Grade-I of the respondent-Bank, challenged the denial of promotion to the Middle Management Grade-II.
2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank would submit that the petitioner, in any event, was promoted to the post of Middle Management Grade-II on 28.03.2008 and he has retired from service on 30.11.2009.
In the above circumstances, nothing survives in the above writ petition and the same would stand dismissed. No costs. Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/- [ true copy ]