← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/20512/2015disposed of

K.Sudarsanan v. Revenue Divisional Officer

2015-07-15Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF JULY 2015/24TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20512 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- K.SUDARSANAN, AGED 45 YEARS PALLIVILAKATHU VEEDU, KARICHAL, KAZHIVOOR P.O. KANJIRAMKULAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695524. BY ADVS.SRI.V.VARGHESE SRI.JELSON J.EDAMPADAM RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. A.UNNI PALLIVILA VEEDU, NEAR LMS CHURCH, KARICHAL KAZHIVOOR P.O., PIN:695524.

3. ANITHA PALLIVILA VEEDU, NEAR LMS CHURCH, KARICHAL KAZHIVOOR P.O., PIN:695524.

4. BALAKRISHNAN PALLIVILA VEEDU, NEAR LMS CHURCH, KARICHAL KAZHIVOOR P.O., PIN:695524.

5. VASANTHI PALLIVILA VEEDU, NEAR LMS CHURCH, KARICHAL KAZHIVOOR P.O., PIN:695524.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI. BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 20512 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 3.11.2014 FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 27.11.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE VILLAGE OFFICER, KANJIRAMKULAM, BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE ds

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 20512 of 2015 (L) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 15th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner only seeks consideration of Ext.P1 application filed, under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, before the 1st respondent.

2.

The petitioner's grievance is against the trees standing in the properties of respondents 2 to 5 and the pathway said to be passing through the said properties. 3.

The learned Government Pleader submits that the same is not a grievance coming under Section 133 of Cr.P.C. and the petitioner would have to take appropriate remedies before the civil court.

4.

In any event, since an application has been filed the same shall be considered after issuing notice to

W.P.(C) No. 20512/2015 -2respondents 2 to 5 as expeditiously as possible. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations, even on the maintainability of the petition, which shall be considered by the R.D.O.

Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj