High Court of KeralaWP(C)/20623/2015disposed of

Hafsal B.N. v. State Of Kerala

2015-07-13Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2015/22ND ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20623 of 2015 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- HAFSAL B.N., AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.BADUSHA, RESIDING AT HASKAR BUILDINGS, VADAKKEVILA.P.O., PALLIMUKKU, KOLLAM DISTRICT-691 010. BY ADVS.SRI.P.B.KRISHNAN SRI.P.M.NEELAKANDAN SRI.P.B.SUBRAMANYAN SRI.SABU GEORGE RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (BUILDINGS), NORTH CIRCLE, PWD COMPLEX, KOZHIKODE-673 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 20623 of 2015 (C) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1TENDER NOTIFICATION BEARING NO.DB1/TN/28/2015-16(PSQ) INVITING TENDER DOCUMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE MAIN BUILDING FOR GOVT. POLYTECHNIC, MAPADI, IN WAYANAD DISTRICT, DATED 20/06/2015 P2E-MAIL ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO RESPONDENT NO.2 SEEKING CLARIFICATIONS, DATED 03.07.2015 P3LETTER FROM THE PETITIONER ADDRESSED TO RESPONDENT NO.2 FOR CLARIFICATIONS, DATED 03.07.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.20623 of 2015 - C ====================== Dated this the 13th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The above writ petition is filed by a contractor, aggrieved by the tender documents produced at Ext.P1, which contains a number of blanks, which disabled the petitioner from applying for the said contract. It is submitted by the learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner that what actually transpired was that no person has applied in pursuance to Ext.P1 tender.

2. In such circumstance, definitely the Government would have to come out with a new tender notification and this Court can merely hope that the same would be done in a proper manner, taking note of Ext.P2 representation. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.