High Court of KeralaWP(C)/24503/2010dismissed as infructuous

Ravi A.N. v. Secretary,Building And Other Constructio

2015-01-16Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/26TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No.24503 of 2010 (K) ------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- -------------------------- RAVI.A.N, AGED 41 YEARS, S/O.VASU, AINIPULLY HOUSE, VATTAMPADAM, KUNNAMKULAM, THRISSUR.

BY ADV. SRI.D.AJITHKUMAR.

RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------

1. SECRETARY, BUILDING AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION WORKERS WELFARE BOARD, THYCAUD P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.

2. DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICER, CIVIL STATION, THRISSUR-680 001.

3. ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER GR.I, DISTRICT LABOUR OFFICE, THRISSUR-680 001.

R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.L.SAJEEVAN, SC, K.B & O.C.W.W.B R1 BY ADV. SRI.ASHIK K.MOHAMED ALI,SC,KB & OCWWB R2 & R3 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.K.RAFEEQ. THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 16-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-

W.P(C).NO.24503 OF 2010-K APPENDIX PETITIOENR'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE MEDICAL CERTIFICATE DATED 17.5.2010 ISSUED BY DR.SYAMAPRASAD..

EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER DATED 6.2.2010. EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 1.3.2010 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION DATED 10.03.2010 OF THE 3RD RESPONDENT.

EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL BEFORE THE SECOND RESPONDENT AGAINST EXT.PO2 ON 17.5.2010.

EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE OF THE MUNICIPAL COUNCILLOR, KUNNAMKULAM.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- ---------------------------------------- NIL.

Vku/ ( true copy )

K.Vinod Chandran, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.24503 of 2010-K --------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner had challenged the levy under the Building and Other Construction Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1996. The learned counsel for the petitioner appears and submits that the entire amounts have been remitted by the petitioner. Since the liability is a one-time cess, nothing survives in the writ petition and the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge vku/- ( true copy )