Jacob John v. The Village Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2015/25TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20682 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
-------------------- JACOB JOHN, AGED 57 YEARS, S/O.K.C.JOHN, KUREEKKATTU THUNDIL, SALLY DALE, KALARKODE, SANATHANAPURAM P.O, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.S.SANAL KUMAR SRI.M.T.SURESHKUMAR SMT.T.J.SEEMA SMT.BHAVANA VELAYUDHAN SMT.SMITHA PHILIPOSE RESPONDENT(S):
--------------------------
1. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PARAVOOR VILLAGE OFFICE, ALAPPUZHA -688561.
2. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, AMBALAPPUZHA TALUK, ALAPPUZHA - 688561.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ALAPPPUZHA - 688001.
BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
mbr/
WP(C).No. 20682 of 2015 (I) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------------------- P1:
TRUE COPY OF THE SALE CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY TRIBUNAL, COCHIN DATED 30.05.2006.
P2:
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RECOVERY OFFICER, DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL COCHIN, DATED 18.07.2008.
P3:
TRUE COPY OF THE COMMUNICATION OF THE 1ST RESPONDENT TO THE PETITIONER DATED 23.09.2009.
P4:
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE DEBT RECOVERY TRIBUNAL DATED 24.09.2009.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:
NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 20682 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 16th day of July, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner seeks for mutation as per Ext.P1 sale certificate issued by the Debts Recovery Tribunal. 2.
However, the learned Government Pleader points out that there is some difference in the extent of the property as shown in the sale certificate from that indicated in the Village records.
3.
In such circumstance the petitioner would have to approach the authority for proper survey of the land. Leaving open such remedy, the Writ Petition would stand closed.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj