High Court of KeralaWP(C)/20692/2015closed

Ameena.R.F v. University Of Calicut

2015-07-21Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2015/30TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20692 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- AMEENA. R.F., AGED 21 YEARS, D/O.FASAL RAHMAN R.V., 'MARHAMA' PUTHENPURAYIL, PANCHARAMUKKU, PALUVAI P.O, THRISSUR.

BY ADV. SRI.SAJU.S.A.

RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM, PIN-673 635.

2. THE REGISTRAR, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM, PIN-673 635.

3. CONTROLLER OF EXAMINATIONS, UNIVERSITY OF CALICUT, CALICUT UNIVERSITY P.O., THENHIPPALAM, MALAPPURAM, PIN-673 635.

BY ADV. SRI.SANTHOSH MATHEW, SC.

THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

WP(C).No. 20692 of 2015 (J) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE ADMISSION NOTICE ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE PRINCIPAL WOMENS CHRISTIAN COLLEGE CHENNAI DATED 16.06.2015.

P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE MIGRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT UNIVERSITY DATED 08.06.2015.

P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26.06.2015 SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.20692 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 21st day of July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking for a direction to the respondents to issue the consolidated B.Sc.Degree mark list of the petitioner within a time limit. 2.

The learned standing counsel for the respondent University on instructions would submit that the mark list has been forwarded to the college of the petitioner. 3.

The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions would submit that the petitioner has received the degree mark list.

As the very purpose sought to be achieved by the filing of the writ petition has been served, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE Scl.