← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/20722/2015disposed of

M.V.Rathbnavally v. The Secretary

2015-07-16Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2015/25TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20722 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- M.V.RATHNAVALLY, W/O.E.N.CHANDRAN, E.N.HOUSE, P.O.ANJAMPEEDIKA, THALASSERY, KANNUR.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT :

-------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KANNUR- 670 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 20722 of 2015 (M) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1TRUE OCPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE BY WHICH THE PETITIONER IS AT PRESENT CONDUCTING SERVICE ON THE ROUTE KANNUR - PAYYANNUR P2TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER FOR REVISION OF HER OWN TIMINGS.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 20722 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The limited prayer in this writ petition is for a direction to the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2, which was submitted by the petitioner for revision of own timings.

2.

The petitioner is operating on the route between Kannur and Payyannur with a set of timings initially fixed on 18.09.2012; and she has been operating without modification. According to her, now, by efflux of time, new services have been introduced, which were allotted running time as per D3 circular taking note of the width of the road. Hence, she filed Ext.P2 application for revision of timings of her service. Aggrieved by the non consideration of Ext.P2 by the respondent, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

W.P.(C) No. 20722 of 2015 ..2..

and the learned Government Pleader in the matter. Considering the nature of the prayer, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P2 after affording the petitioner and the affected parties, if any, an opportunity of being heard, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition before the respondent at the earliest.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-