← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/20731/2015dismissed

Salimsha O.K v. The Kerala State Electricity Board

2015-07-09Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH THURSDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JULY 2015/18TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20731 of 2015 (N) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- SALIMSHA O.K KOKKATTUTHARAYIL PALLIPPADU, THRIKKUNNAPUZHA P.O.

ALAPPUZHA - 690 515 BY ADVS.SRI.SHABU SREEDHARAN SRI.S.VIJAYAN SRI.K.P.UNNIKRISHNAN (ELOOR) SRI.V.N.MOHAN RAJ SRI.K.V.PREMSANKAR SMT.RESHMA ABDUL RASHEED RESPONDENTS:

---------------------------- 1.

THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY VYDYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004 2.

THE ASST. ENGINEER ELECTRICAL SECTION, HARIPPAD, ALAPPUZHA - 690 514 3.

THE SUB ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION HARIPPAD, ALAPPUZHA - 690 514 BY SRI.JAICE JACOB, SC, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 20731 of 2015 (N) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE SITE MAHAZAR DATED 21.05.2015 EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL PENAL BILL DATED 23.05.2015 EXT. P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE PROVISIONAL ASSESSMENT BILL DATED 27.05.2015 EXT.P4:

TRUE COPY OF THE OBJECTION DATED 01.06.2015 EXT.P5:

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 20.06.2015 EXT.P6:

TRUE COPY OF THE ASSESSMENT ORDER ALONG WITH THE FINAL BILL AND CALCULATION STATEMENT DATED 29.06.2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 20731 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 9th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ext. P6 order of assessment accompanied by final bill is impugned. The same can very well be challenged in a statutory appeal. An appeal lies under Section 127 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

2.

The petitioner contends that mandatory procedures have not been followed. The same is a disputed question of fact. Only the appellate authority can delve deep into those aspects.

I dismiss the writ petition without prejudice to the right of the petitioner to file an appeal.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE