Lekha I v. Kerala Public Service Commission
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20981 of 2014 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
-------------------- LEKHA I LOHITHA MANDIRAM, KARAVARAM PO, (VIA) KALLAMBALAM THOTTAKKAD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISRICT, PIN 695 605 BY ADVS.SRI.S.P.ARAVINDAKSHAN PILLAY SMT.N.SANTHA SRI.K.A.BALAN SRI.PETER JOSE CHRISTO SRI.S.A.ANAND SMT.L.AMMU PILLAI RESPONDENTS:
----------------------------
1. KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY OFFICE OF THE KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION PATTOM PALACE PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN 695 004.
2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM PATTOM PALACE PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 001.
3. THE CHIEF ENGINEER(HRM) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VYDYUTHI BHAVANAM PATTOM PALACE PO, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM PIN 695 004 R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC R2 & R3 BY ADV. SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 20981 of 2014 (W) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION IN THE GAZETTE DATED 30/6/2009 EXHIBIT P2 COPY OF THE NOTIFICATION SL.NO.63/13/ER V DATED 12/8/2013, THE P.S.C.
EXHIBIT P3 COPY OF THE RANKED LIST OPF 457/2014/SSVI FOR TYHE POST OF ASSISTANT ENGINEER (CIVIL) IN K.S.E.B.
EXHIBIT P4 COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 25/7/2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE CHAIRMAN OF THE P.S.C.WITH COPY TO SECRETARY TO P.S.C.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 20981 of 2014 (W) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 2nd day of November, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already got 'advice memo' from the Public Service Commission and is awaiting appointment. In such circumstance, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, leaving open all contentions of the petitioner.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 2/11/15