Sivadasan v. Secretary,Kottakkal Special Grade Pancha

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI TUESDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/12TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31033 of 2006 (T) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

--------------------- SIVADASAN, S/O. KADUNGI, RESIDING AT PERIKKATHARA HOUSE, POST IRINGALLUR, VIA VENGARA, TIRUR TALUK, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, KOTTAKKAL SPECIAL GRADE PANCHAYATH, POST KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

2. THE KOTTAKKAL SPECIAL GRADE PANCHAYATH, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, POST KOTTAKKAL, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MALAPPURAM.

R1&R2 BY ADV. SRI.M.V.BOSE R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.SOJAN JAMES THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

WP(C).No. 31033 of 2006 (T) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1.

TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION DATED 3/8/04 OF THE R1 EXHIBIT P2.

TRUE COPY OF THE AGREEMENT EXECUTED BETWEEN THE PETITIONER AND THE R1 EXHIBIT P3.

TRUE COPY OF THE PAPER PUBLICATION DATED 17/8/2006 PUBLISHED IN THE MALAYALA MANORAMA DAILY EXHIBIT P4.

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SENT BY THE PETITIONER BY REGD.POST DATED 29/6/06 TO R1 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- EXHIBIT R1(A): TRUE COPY OF THE OFFIER IN WRITING GIVEN BY THE PETITIONER DATED 16/8/2004 TO SECRETARY, KOTTAKKAL GRAMA PANCHAYAT. EXHIBIT R1(B): TRUE COPY OF CERTIFICATE DATED 9/11/06 ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 31033 of 2006 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of November, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to make payment for the land, which was taken advance possession from the petitioner.

2.

Today, when the matter came up for hearing, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent panchayath submitted that the respondent panchayath has given fair value of the property to the petitioner. Recording the submission, the writ petition is closed. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/03.11.15