C.K.Balan v. Changanacherry Municipality
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/24TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 21186 of 2014 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:
----------- C.K.BALAN AGED 52 YEARS S/O KUNJUKOCHU, DRIVER, CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY CHANGANACHERRY, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT RESIDING AT PANACHIMOOTTIL, THRIKODITHANAM, MALLOORKAVU CHANGANACHERRY BY ADVS.SRI.S.JAYAKRISHNAN SRI.S.PARAMESWARA PRASAD RESPONDENTS:
------------
1. CHANGANACHERRY MUNICIPALITY REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CHANGANACHERRY PIN - 686 101.
2. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON, CHANGANACHERRY PIN - 686 101.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.M.P.ASHOK KUMAR R1 BY ADV. SMT.BINDU SREEDHAR R1 BY ADV. SMT.R.S.MANJULA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 21186 of 2014 (W) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
------------------------ EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DATED 28.02.2003 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.H4-536/14 DATED 16.01.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 26.05.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 09.06.2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:NIL True Copy/ P A to Judge
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
========================= W.P(C).No.21186 of 2014 ============================ Dated this the 14th day of January, 2015
JUDGMENT
Petitioner is working as Driver under the 1st respondent-Changanacherry Municipality. Petitioner submits that he entered service under the first respondent as Driver on 26.07.1996 and he has uninterrupted service for the last 18 years. Petitioner further submits that he belongs to Schedule Caste and his appointment in the post of Driver was against the permanent vacancy. Petitioner made Ext.P3 request before the first respondent to regularize the service. But no action has been taken so far. Aggrieved, petitioner approached this Court. 2.
In view of Ext.P3, appropriate decision shall be taken by the first respondent within a period of two months after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.
Sbna/15/01/15