Mullungal Kunji Pokker v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2015/22ND ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 20996 of 2015 (Y) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- MULLUNGAL KUNJI POKKER, AGED 63, S/O. AHAMED KUTTY, CHERNNOOR, CHORAKKODE, VELIMUKKU, MALAPPURAM-676 317.

BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, MALAPPURAM-676 505.

2. THE SUB COLLECTOR, OFFICE OF THE SUB COLLECTOR, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 101.

3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 101.

4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, MOONNIYOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 311.

5. MURUKKOLI KUNJAN, S/O. NAIDI, CHERUNOOR, CHORAKKOD, VELLIMUKKU P.O., TIRUR, MALAPPURAM-676 317.

R1 TO R4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 20996 of 2015 (Y) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- P1 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P2 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT DTD.9.12.2014.

P3 :

TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DTD.10.6.2014.

P4 :

TRUE COPY OF THE NOTICE DTD.26.5.2015.

P5 :

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DTD.20.6.2015 AND THE RECEIPT THEREOF DTD.22.6.2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 20996 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 13th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, a senior citizen complains of the overhanging of trees, which belong to 5th respondent. The petitioner made an application before the District Collector by Ext.P1. Though a notice was issued, nothing was done on the same. Subsequently the petitioner has moved an application evidenced at Ext.P5. The same shall be considered as an application filed under Section 133 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and notice issued to the 5th respondent. The 3rd respondent shall dispose of the same, as expeditiously as possible, considering the seriousness of the allegations made therein and the apprehension of imminent danger projected.

Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge