← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21024/2015disposed of

Roy P.V. v. The Kerala State Electricity Board

2015-07-28Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JULY 2015/6TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21024 of 2015 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ ROY P.V., AGED 40, S/O.P.C.VARGHESE, PARAYAMCHALIL HOUSE, ANACHAL, CHITHIRAPURAM P.O, DEVICULAM TALUK.

BY ADV. SRI.BABU PAUL RESPONDENTS:

-----------------------

1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VYDHYUTHI BHAVAN, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2. THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (DISTRIBUTION) KSEB, MEENCUT, CHITHIRAPURAM P.O. 685 565.

3. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER (DISTRIBUTION) KSEB, CHITHIRAPURAM P.O, 685 565.

BY SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 21024 of 2015 (C) APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPIES OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS OF THE TRANSFORMER. EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 28.10.13.

EXHIBIT P3 TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGMENT CARD.

EXHIBIT P4 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 10.2.14 BY THE PETITIONER. EXHIBIT P5 THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FILED BEFORE THE SUB COLLECTOR, DEVIKULAM BY THE PETITIONER.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE.

V. CHITAMBARESH, J -------------------------------- WP(C) NO. 21024 OF 2015 ------------------------------------ Dated this the 28th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks shifting of a transformer which is stated to be dangerously close to his residential building. The petitioner points out that there is space enough on the opposite side for the 110 KV transformer to be shifted. 2.

Ext.P4 complaint put in by the petitioner in this regard is pending consideration. I direct the Additional Divisional Magistrate, Devikulam to deal with Ext.P4 complaint. The same shall be done with notice to the petitioner and other affected parties.

3.

Every endeavour shall be made to take the proceedings to a logical end within a period of two months. The Writ Petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE ncd