High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21049/2015disposed of

K.Ratnamma v. Tahasildar

2015-07-21Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2015/30TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21049 of 2015 (E) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- K.RATNAMMA, AGED 87 YEARS, D/O.LATE VELAYUDHAN PILLAI, SREEVALSOM, AMBATTUKAVU, ALUVA.

BY ADV. SRI.REJI GEORGE RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. TAHASILDAR, ALUVA TALUK, TALUK OFFICE, ALUVA - 683 001.

2. VILLAGE OFFICER, CHOORNIKKARA VILLAGE, KUNNATHERI, THAIKKATTUKARA P.O., ALUVA - 683 001 BY SENIOR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 21049 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 - TRUE COPY OF THE RELATIONSHIP CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE SECOND RESPONDENT.

P2 - THE TRUE COPY OF THE MATTER PERTAINING TO THE APPLICATION NO. H3-1072/2015 PUBLISHED IN VOL.4 GAZETTE NO. 25 ON 23.06.2015 (RELEVANT PORTION) RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No. 21049 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 21st day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, an unmarried, aged lady having 87 years of age is before this Court seeking that the petitioner's name be removed from Ext.P2 Gazette notification. The petitioner being an unmarried aged lady was residing with her brother, the wife and children of whom are the other legal heirs shown in Ext.P2; specifically notification No. H3-1072/2015 dated 21.05.2015 (item No.5). The petitioner's contention is that the petitioner not being a class I heir, is not entitled to succeed to the brother's property, especially since the class 1 heirs being the wife and children are available. In such circumstance, it is only proper that the 1st respondent correct the notification by issuance of a fresh gazette notification, on production of the certified copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge

WPC.No.11450/2013 : 2 :