High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21079/2015disposed of

Krishnakumar M. v. The Chairman, Kerala State Electricity Board

2015-07-14Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR TUESDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF JULY 2015/23RD ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).NO. 21079 OF 2015 (H) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------- KRISHNAKUMAR M., AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.SIVARAMA MENON, CASHIER, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD KOTTAYI, PALAKKAD-678 572 RESIDING AT "MADATHIL HOUSE"

CHUNGAMANNAM, PLATHUR (PO) PALAKKAD MOBILE:9446975142 BY ADV. SRI.U.BALAGANGADHARAN RESPONDENT(S):

--------------

1. THE CHAIRMAN KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001

2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (HRM) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001

3. THE SECRETARY (ADMINISTRATION) KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.LOWSY.A BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).NO. 21079 OF 2015 (H) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

EXT.P1: A TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 6.10.2006 WITH RELEVANT PAGES OF THE LIST APPENDED THERETO EXT.P2: A TRUE COPY OF THE POSTING ORDER DATED 16.03.2009 ISSUED BY THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PALAKKAD EXT.P3: A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 21.01.2010 WITH RELEVANT PAGE OF THE LIST APPENDED THERETO EXT.P4: A TRUE COPY OF THE BOARD ORDER DATED 02.07.2014 EXT.P5: A TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED BY THE PAINTER TO THE SECOND RESPONDENT DATED 2.6.2015 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL //TRUE COPY// P A TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

............................................................. W.P.(C).No.21079 of 2015 ............................................................. Dated this the 14th day of July, 2015 J U D G M E N T The petitioner, who is a Mazdoor working as cashier under the respondent Board, has approached the respondent Board with a representation seeking regularisation in service by relaxing the eligibility criteria. The limited prayer of the petitioner in the writ petition is for a direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation expeditiously, after hearing the petitioner.

2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader for the respondents.

On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions made across the bar, I direct the 2nd respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P5 representation within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment after hearing the petitioner. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the writ petition along with a copy of this judgment before the 2nd respondent for further action. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE mns