← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21106/2015disposed of

Muhammed Rafeeque v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority

2015-07-20Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2015/29TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21106 of 2015 (K) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- MUHAMMED RAFEEQUE, S/O.ABOOBACKER, THOLAKKARA HOUSE, MALAYIDAMTHURUTHU, KIZHAKKAMBALAM, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK RESPONDENT(S) :

--------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA-686 661.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 21106 of 2015 (K) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

---------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST FOR CLEARANCE CERTIFICATE FILED ON 07.07.2015.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 21106 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 20th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Seeking for a direction to the respondent to issue clearance certificate by keeping the regular permit under suspended animation without insisting on surrender of existing regular permit, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

2.

The petitioner is a regular stage carriage permit holder on the route between Pukkattupady and Aluva in respect of stage carriage bearing Reg.No.KL 07/BC 4010. As the petitioner is intending to replace the above vehicle with a later model vehicle, he submitted Ext.P1 request before the respondent to issue clearance certificate keeping the permit under suspended animation. As the respondent has not considered the application till date, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

W.P.(C) No. 21106 of 2015 ..2..

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader in the matter. Considering the nature of the prayer, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 application submitted by the petitioner within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.

To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition before the respondent at the earliest.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-