M.D.,Kerala Agro Industries Corpn Ltd v. Joju M.Francis
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/23RD ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 31529 of 2005 (C) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :
-------------------- THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA AGRO INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD., HEAD OFFICE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADV.SRI.E.K.NANDAKUMAR RESPONDENT(S) :
----------------------------
1. JOJU M. FRANCIS, PROPRIETOR, M/S.PRINTOGRAPH, SHOP NO.162 JAIHIND MARKET, C. BLOCK, M.G.ROAD THRISSUR.
2. KERALA LOK AYUKTA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.N.P.SAMUEL R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI. MANOJ P. KUNJACHAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: Mn ...2/-
WP(C).No. 31529 of 2005 (C) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
EXT.P1 : COPY OF THE G.O.(RT) NO. 1725/05/AD DATED 28.5.2005 PASSED BY THE GOVT. OF KERALA.
EXT.P2 COPY OF THE COMPLAINT NO. 577/04 DATED 28.5.2004 WITHOUT THE ENCLOSURES THERETO FILED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3 COPY OF THE COUNTER AFFIDAVIT DATED 9TH OCTOBER 2004 IN COMPLAINT NO. 577/2004 FILED BY THE PETITIONER. EXT.P4 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10.11.04 IN COMPLAINT NO. 577/2004 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P5 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 13.04.05 IN COMPLAINT NO. 577/2004 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P6 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 15.07.05 IN COMPLAINT NO. 577/2004 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P7 COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 20.09.05 IN COMPLAINT NO. 577/2004 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P8 COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 17.11.2005 FROM THE GOVERNMENT OF KERALA TO THE PETITIONER.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS : NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE Mn
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
------------------------------------------ W.P(C).No. 31529 of 2005 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th October, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has been directed to pay the amount due to the complainant before the Lok Ayukta in Complaint No.577/2004. On account of non payment, the petitioner was directed to appear in person.
Considering the fact that the Writ Petition is of the year 2005 and taking note of the interim order passed by this Court, the direction to appear before the Lok Ayukta is set aside. It is open for the Lok Ayukta to consider whether the complainant's grievances have been redressed or not. However, any further action shall be taken only based on fresh order. The complainant is free to move the Lok Ayukta for further relief in the matter.
The Writ Petition is disposed of as above.
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE JUDGE vgs15/10/15