High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21178/2015disposed of

Ratheesan V.R. v. Corporation Of Kochi

2015-10-08Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/16TH ASWINA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21178 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------ RATHEESAN V.R., AGED 60 YEARS S/O.RAMACHANDRAN, CHAITHANYA HOUSE NO.21/1717 (OLD NO.19/1194), S.D.P.Y ROAD PALLURUTHY.P.O., KOCHI-682 006.

BY ADVS.SRI.JIMMY GEORGE (VATTATHARA) SRI.T.JEEJAN RESPONDENTS:

----------------------

1. CORPORATION OF KOCHI REPRSENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, KOCHI CORPORATION ERNAKULAM-682 011.

2. DIRECTOR OF MUNCIPALITIES O/O. DIRECTORATE OF MUNICIPALITIES THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

3. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, P.B.NO.1016, PATTOM THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 004.

4. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.

BY ADVS. SRI.K.P.JUSTINE(KARIPAT)SC,COCHIN CORPORATION SMT.T.N.GIRIJA, SC, EPF ORGANISATION SRI.P.K.SOYUZ, SC, COCHIN CORPORATION BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J. RAJASREE THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 21178 of 2015 (V) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ----------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 :

COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 04.04.2015.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE sp

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

--------------------------------------- W.P(C). No.21178 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of October, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P1 representation dated 04.04.2015 filed before the first respondent. The prayer of the petitioner is to direct the first respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 within a reasonable time.

In such circumstances, there will be a direction to the first respondent to consider and dispose of Ext.P1 representation as expeditiously as possible and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. It is made clear that, this Court has not made any observation on merits, which the first respondent will consider in accordance with law. The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE sp //True Copy// P.A. to Judge.