High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21312/2015closed

S.Suresh Kumar v. The State Of Kerala

2015-12-04Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2015/13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21312 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- S.SURESH KUMAR AGED 42 YEARS S/O.SHANMUGHAN, DRIVER, KOLLENGODE GRAMA PANCHAYTH KOLLENGODE PO, PALAKKAD DISTRICT RESIDING AT VELLANTHARA, KOLLENGODE, PALAKKAD DISTRICT BY ADV. SRI.S.VIDYASAGAR RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT LOCAL SELF GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695001

2. THE KOLLENGODE GRAMA PANCHAYTH KOLLENGODE PO, PALAKKAD DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY 678631

3. THE SECRETARY KOLLENGODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH, KOLLENGODE PO PALAKKAD DISTRICT 678631 R2,R 3 BY ADV. SRI.S.KANNAN, SC, KOLLENGODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. M.J.RAJASREE BY SRI.N.ANAND, SC, KOLLENGODE GRAMA PANCHAYATH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-12-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 21312 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE DECISION TAKEN BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN ITS MEETING HELD ON 22.04.2010 P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE EXPERIENCE CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO THE APPLICANT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED NIL SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT TO THE 3RD RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE JJJ

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 21312 of 2015 (L ) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 4th day of December, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks continuance in a daily wage employment. The writ petition has been filed contending that there is a threat of retrenchment. 2.

The learned Standing Counsel for the Panchayat submits that as of now they do not intend to terminate him. However, if a regular appointment is made, definitely the petitioner's services has to be terminated.

With that reservation, the writ petition would stand closed.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj 4/12/15