High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21714/2015disposed of

Muhammed Jamal Haji v. Intelligence Officer

2015-07-20Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE MONDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF JULY 2015/29TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21714 of 2015 (L) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------- MUHAMMED JAMAL HAJI, PROPRIETOR, HAJI GROUP, PUTHENTHERU, THANUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.ANIL KUMAR (TRIVANDRUM) SRI.K.S.HARIHARAN NAIR RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. INTELLIGENCE OFFICER (IB), COMMERCIAL TAXES, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN - 678 608.

2. COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 678 611.

3. THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES, TAX TOWERS, KARAMANA, THIRUVANANTHAURAM - 695 002.

4. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), TALUK OFFICE, TIRUR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT - 678 611.

BY SENIOR GOVT. PLEADER SMT.SOBHA ANNAMMA EAPEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 21714 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- P1COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 30.12.2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT. P2COPY OF ORDER DATED 21.4.2015 OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MALAPPURAM.

P3COPY OF REVISION PETITION FILED AGAINST EXT.P2 ORDER. P4COPY OF PETITION FOR CONDONING DELAY.

P5COPY OF STAY PETITION.

P6COPY OF DEMAND NOTICE DATED 24.6.15 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT UNDER THE RR ACT.

RESPONDENTS' ANNEXURES:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No.21714 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 20th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner filed Ext.P3 revision before the third respondent. The petitioner also filed an application for stay. It appears that the revision is filed with delay condonation application. In view of the above, this writ petition is disposed of with the following directions:

i. If the delay condonation application is allowed, the stay application shall be considered within a period of one month after issuing notice to the petitioner. ii. To work out the above relief, recovery proceedings initiated against the petitioner shall be deferred. Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln