High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21730/2015dismissed as infructuous

D.P.Balakrishnan Embrandiri v. Cochin Devaswam Board, Represented By Its Secretary

2015-07-23Honourable Dr. Justice A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JULY 2015/1ST SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21730 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- D.P.BALAKRISHNAN EMBRANDIRI, AGED 50 YEARS S/O.PADMANABHAN EMBRANDIRI, DEVASWAMPARAMBIL HOUSE KOLOTHUMKADAVU, PALLIPPURAM P.O NORTH PARAVOOR -683 515 (SANTHI IN SREEKRISHNA SWAMI TEMPLE PALLIPURAM) BY ADV. SRI.B.RAMACHANDRAN RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- COCHIN DEVASWAM BOARD ROUND NORTH, THRISSUR-680 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY R BY SRI.KRISHNA MENON, SC, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 21730 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 - A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 07.03.2008 OF THE SPECIAL DEVASWAM COMMISSIONER EXT.P2 - A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 19.09.2012 OF THE SPECIAL DEVASWAM COMMISSIONER EXT.P3 - A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.07.2015 IN WPC. NO.19228/2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL.

--------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.

------------------------------- W.P.(C).NO.21730 OF 2015 (M) ----------------------------------- Dated this the 23rd day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner, who is working as a Santhi under the respondent Board, approached this Court through the present writ petition, aggrieved by an order of transfer, whereby the petitioner was transferred from Pallippuram to Thripunithura. When the matter came up today for admission, it is pointed out by counsel for the petitioner that the respondent Board has since passed a fresh order dated 21.7.2015, transferring the petitioner to Kuzhippilli Temple, and the petitioner has also since joined duties at the said Temple. Taking note of this submission of counsel for the petitioner, and finding that the grievance of the petitioner in the writ petition stands redressed, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE prp