← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21983/2014disposed of

Dr.P.A.Abraham v. Pallickathodu Grama Panchayat

2015-10-26Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2015/4TH KARTHIKA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21983 of 2014 (W) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------- DR.P.A.ABRAHAM PUTHENPURACKAL HOUS, ANICKAD.P.O., KOTTAYAM-686 503. BY ADVS.SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS SRI.PAUL JACOB (P) SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL SRI.S.SREEDEV SRI.RONY JOSE SRI.GEORGE A.CHERIAN RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------

1. PALLICKATHODU GRAMA PANCHAYAT ANICKADU.P.O.

KOTTAYAM-686503. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

2. SECRETARY, PALLICKATHODU GRAMA PANCHAYATH, ANICKADU.P.O. KOTTAYAM-686503.

R1 & 2 BY ADV. SRI.S.MANU THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 26-10-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 21983 of 2014 (W) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------- P1. TRUE COPY OF THE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER. P2. TRUE COPY OF THE CERTIFICATE DTD. 3-12-12 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

P3 A TRUE PHOTOGRAPH OF THE CONSTRUCTED BUILDING. P4. TRUE CPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 3-9-2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

P5. TRUE COPY OF THE STATEMENT DTD. 4-7-2014 FILED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.

------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.21983 of 2014 --------------------- Dated this the 26th day of October, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner seeks a completion certificate and allotment of number to his building. The petitioner asserts that the construction does not offend any statutory rule.

2.

Ext.P4 application put in by the petitioner is pending. I direct the second respondent to pass orders on Ext.P1 application within six weeks. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

Sufficient opportunity shall be afforded to the petitioner to explain his stand.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj/27.10.15