Sanil Kumar V. v. The Executive Engineer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF JULY 2015/30TH ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21923 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
----------------- SANIL KUMAR V., AGED 46 YEARS S/O.VASUDEVAN, ROHINI, ARA 48, NETTAYAM P.O.
VATTIYOORKAVU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 013 BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.IBRAHIM SMT.K.P.AMBIKA SMT.A.A.SHIBI RESPONDENT(S):
------------------ 1.
THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION COMPLAINTS KSEB POWER HOUSE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023 2.
THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER CONSTRUCTION KSEB POWER HOUSE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 023 R BY SRI.SAJEEVKUMAR K.GOPAL,SC,KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 21923 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ---------------------------- EXHIBIT P1 TRUE COPY OF PHOTOGRAPH OF THE GATE PROVIDED FOR ENTRY TO THE HOUSE EXHIBIT P2 TRUE COPIES OF THE PHOTOGRAPHS SHOWING THE NEW PILLARS PUT UP ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING TRANSFORMERS FOR RMU TRASFORMERS EXHIBIT P3 TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE POLES ERECTED IN FRONT OF PETITIONER'S CAR PORCH EXHIBIT P4 TRUE PHOTO COPY OF THE TRANSFORMER NO 58 IN VATTIYOORKAVU -NETTAYAM PWD ROAD EXHIBIT P5 TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 15-06-2015 EXHIBIT P6 TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER ADDRESSED TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT DATED 15-06-2015 BY MR. K MURALEEDHARAN,MLA REPRESENTING VATTIYOORKAVU LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY CONSTITUENCY EXHIBIT P7 TRUE COPY OF THE TESTIMONY/REQUEST OF THE CONCILLOR OF NETTAYAM WARD OF CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DATED 23-06-2015 EXHIBIT P8 TRUE COPY OF THE REQUEST OF THE RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION DATED 15-06-2015 RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE.
V.CHITAMBARESH, J.
--------------------- W.P (C) No.21923 of 2015 --------------------- Dated this the 21st day of July, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner is aggrieved by the location of a Ring Main Unit (RMU) transformer by the Kerala State Electricity Board. The petitioner contends that the same blocks the easy access to his car porch. The request of the petitioner is to re-locate the RMU transformer beyond the pillars of his gate.
2. Ext.P5 representation put in by the petitioner is pending consideration. The local Member of Legislative Assembly has also addressed the first respondent by Ext.P6 representation. I direct the first respondent to consider Exts.P5 and P6 representations expeditiously. The needful shall be done within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment.
3. The RMU transformer shall not be energised till orders are passed on Exts.P5 and P6 representations as directed above.
The Writ Petition is disposed of.
Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.
nj.