← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21980/2015disposed of

Fahadali K. v. The Regional Transport Authority, Kozhikode

2015-07-30Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2015/8TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21980 of 2015 (V) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- FAHADALI K., KANNANARI HOUSE, CHOOLAMPADAM, SARADA MANDIRAM, P.O KOLATHARA, KOZHIKODE.

BY ADV. SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY-673 020.

2. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, KOZHIKODE-673 020.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADERM SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 21980 of 2015 (V) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT APPLICATION ALONG WITH PROPOSED TIMING ON THE ROUTE PULLIKADAVE-FEROKE-CHELIYAM KADAVE-MANACHIRA DT. 16/6/2015.

EXT.P2:

TRUE COPY OF THE CHALAN RECEIPT DATED 16/6/15. EXT.P3:

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 5/6/13 IN WPC NO. 14088/13. RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 21980 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has come up before this Court for a direction to the respondents to consider Ext.P1 application for regular permit.

2.

The petitioner applied for regular permit on the route, Pullikadave - Feroke - Chaliyam Kadave - Manachira. According to him, the route applied for by the petitioner is ill served route and there are only very few services that are being operated on the portions of the route and the students and traveling public are put to extreme difficulties for want of more services; and therefore, urgent steps are to be taken to grant and issue the permit. Hence, the petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondents for a final disposal of Ext.P1.

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner

W.P.(C) No. 21980 of 2015 ..2..

and the learned Government Pleader in the matter. Considering the nature of the relief, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondents to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P1 within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment, after affording the petitioner and the affected parties an opportunity of being heard.

To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition before the respondents at the earliest.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-