← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/21989/2015disposed of

Sebastian Thomas v. The State Of Kerala

2015-07-22Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 21989 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER ------------------ SEBASTIAN THOMAS, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.THOMAS, VENATTU HOUSE, PANDANGARI.P.O, EDATHVA, KUTTANAD, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.A.JAYASANKAR SRI.C.V.MANUVILSAN SRI.MANU GOVIND SRI.ASHWIN SETHUMADHAVAN SMT.INDULEKHA JOSEPH RESPONDENTS -----------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695001.

2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, COLLECTORATE, ALAPPUZHA-688001.

3. THE TAHSILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, KUTTANAD TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688505.

4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, THAKAZHI VILLAGE, KUTTANAD TALUK, THAKAZHI.P.O, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT-688562.

BY SPL.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.P.K.SOYUZ THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

P T O

WP(C).No. 21989 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXT.P1. A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 13.03.2015.

EXT.P2. A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE ORDER DATED 03.06.2015,ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

EXT.P3. A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REPORT OF THE VILLAGE OFFICER SUBMITTED TO THE SUB COLLECTOR VIDE NO.54/13/KLU DATED 25.11.2013. EXT.P4. A TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE REVISION PREFERRED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT WITHOUT ANNEXURES.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL.

--------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.S.TO JUDGE NVB

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 21989 of 2015 (W) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The only prayer of the petitioner is that the petitioner has filed a revision against Ext.P2 order of the District Collector under the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wet Land Act, 2008. The petitioner prays that status quo may be directed till the revision is considered on merits.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a status quo till the revision is disposed of, specifically observing that the petitioner also shall not interfere further with the nature and lie of the property till the revision is disposed of. The 1st respondent shall dispose of the revision as expeditiously as possible. Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj