High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22114/2015disposed of

Harilal G. v. The Secretary, Rta

2015-07-22Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JULY 2015/31ST ASHADHA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22114 of 2015 (L) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- HARILAL G., S/O.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR, ETTIKKAMURYYIL HOUSE, CHIRAKADAVU EAST, MANNARKAYAM P.O., PONKUNNAM, KOTTAYAM.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI-685 603.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 22114 OF 2015 (L) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS ----------------------------------- P1:

COPY OF THE REGULAR WITH WHICH PETITIONER IS OPERATING ON THE ROUTE KUMILY-KOTTAYAM.

P2:

COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE WITH WHICH PETITIONER IS OPERTING ON THE ROUTE KUMILY-KOTTAYAM P3:

COPY OF THE PERMIT VALID TILL 19/9/15 ON THE ROUTE KUMILY-KOTTAYAM P4:

COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 10/6/15 RESPONDENTS' EXHIBIT ----------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No.22114 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 22nd day of July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved by the non-consideration of his request for revision of his own timings.

The petitioner alleges that he preferred a request for revision of timings of his own service operating on the route between Kumily and Kottyam. The timings has been settled initially on 14.1.2000. The permit and the vehicle originally belonged to one A.M.Ashraf and now it is in the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner preferred a request for revision of his own service and the prayer in the writ petition is for a direction to consider Ext.P4. It is with this background, the petitioner has come up before this court. 3.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader in the matter. 4.

Considering the nature of the submissions and the nature of the relief sought for, the writ petition is disposed of

W.P.(C) No.22114 of 2015 -2directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P4 request, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. To facilitate an early action, it shall be open to the petitioner to produce a copy of the writ petition as well as a copy of this judgment before the respondent at the earliest. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE Scl.