Mereena V.P. v. State Of Kerala.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:- THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2015/11TH KARTHIKA, 1937 W.P.(C).No.32610 of 2005 (F) -------------------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):- --------------------------
1. SMT. MEREENA. V.P., L.P.S.A., ST. GEORGE'S HIGH SCHOOL, PUTHANPALLI, VARAPUZHA P.O., PIN-683 517.
* 2. JESSY P.J., W/O. ANTOO B.C., BRAHMAKULAM HOUSE, KONGORPILLY P.O., KONGORPILLY [REMOVED].
3. SMT. THERESA BINDU. P.C., L.P.S.A., L.F.L.P. SCHOOL, OLANAD, VARAPUZHA P.O., PIN-683 517.
* [PETITIONER NO.2 IS REMOVED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER DATED 18.6.2007 IN I.A.NO.7966/07] BY ADVS.SMT.V.P.SEEMANDINI (SENIOR ADVOCATE) SMT.S.KARTHIKA SMT.VEENA.B.KUMAR SMT.T.B.REMANI SRI.T.R.RAJESH RESPONDENT(S):- ----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVT., GENERAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALWAYE.
4. THE ASSISTANT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ALUVA.
5. THE MANAGER, ST. GEORGE'S CHURCH CORPORATE EDUCATIONAL AGENCY, PUTHANPALLI, VARAPUZHA.
6. THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, ERNAKULAM.
** ADDITIONAL 7TH RESPONDENT IMPLEADED:
------------------------------------------------------------------ ADDL.R7.
JESSY P.J., W/O. ANTO B.C., BRAHMAKULAM HOUSE, KONGORPILLY P.O., KONGORPILLY.
** [ADDITIONAL 7TH RESPONDENT IS IMPLEADED AS PER ORDER DATED 14.08.2007 IN I.A.NO.10928 OF 2007] R1 TO R4 & R6 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.S.JAMAL. R7 BY ADV. SRI.S.RAMESH BABU.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 02-11-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:-
APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- ------------------------------------- EXT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 17.9.98 ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY.
EXT.P1(a) TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DT.2.10.1999. EXT.P1(b) TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DT.20.9.1999. EXT.P1(c) TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DT.6.1.2001. EXT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 9.7.02 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P3 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 14.03.2005.
EXT.P4 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL AND THE ORDER DATED 16.2.2005, PASSED BY THE MINISTER IN THAT APPEAL.
EXT.P5 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION FILED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 21.06.2005.
EXT.P6 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 28.06.2002 ISSUED BY THE 4TH RESPONDENT.
EXT.P7 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 17.09.2004 ISSUED BY THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
EXT.P8 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL FILED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT DATED 309.2005.
EXT.P9 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 9.8.2000. EXT.P10 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 19.10.2001. EXT.P11 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 14.2.2005 FILED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT.
EXT.P12 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 27.7.2004 FILED BY THE 5TH RESPONDENT.
EXT.P13 TRUE COPY OF THE REARRANGEMENT PROPOSAL DATED 7.8.2002 ISSUED BY THE MANAGER.
EXT.P14 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION DATED 29.3.2005 FILED BY THE MANAGER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P15 TRUE COPY OF THE REVISION DATED 10.06.2005 FILED BY THE MANAGER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.
EXT.P16 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 9.8.2005 FILED BY THE MANAGER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P17 TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 9.8.2005 FILED BY THE 3RD PETITIOENR BEFORE THE 4TH RESPONDENT. EXT.P18 TRUE COPY OF THE G.O.(P)NO.169/04/G.EDN. DATED 15.6.2004. EXT.P19 TRUE COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 31.3.2004 FILED BY THE MANAGER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXT.P20 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 10.02.2006.
EXT.P21 TRUE COPY OF THE APPOINTMENT ORDER DATED 5.6.2006. EXT.P22 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 12.6.2006.
EXT.P23 TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 4.10.2006.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- ---------------------------------------- vku/- [ true copy ]
K. Vinod Chandran, J ------------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.32610 of 2005-F ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 02nd day of November, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioners are concerned with different spells of temporary appointments, which are not approved by the Educational authorities. The 2nd petitioner has withdrawn from the contest. The 1st petitioner is aggrieved with the rejection of approval for the following spells:
18.10.2001 to 31.03.2002 } 02.07.2003 to 03.09.2003 } U.P.S.A.
04.09.2003 to 26.09.2003 } 26.11.2002 to 03.02.2003 } 01.10.2003 to 02.12.2003 } L.P.S.A.
22.11.2004 to 19.09.2005 } 20.09.2005 to 19.09.2007 } The 3rd petitioner is aggrieved, again with the following spells: 18.10.2000 to 20.12.2000 } 02.01.2001 to 16.03.2001 } U.P.S.A.
06.06.2001 to 28.06.2002 } 01.10.2003 to 02.12.2003 } H.S.A.
2. It is submitted that the rejection of approval has been challenged by the respective petitioners and are pending before the various authorities. In such circumstance, it is only
WP(C).Nos.32610 of 2005 proper that the petitioners approach the various authorities for disposal of the said matters and the petitioners would also produce a certified copy of this judgment before such authorities so as to get expeditious disposal of the same. The writ petition is disposed off, without going into the merits of the contentions.
Sd/- K.Vinod Chandran Judge.
vku/- [ true copy ]