Moosan v. Deputy Chief Engineer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH MONDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/20TH MAGHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 22503 of 2014 (K) PETITIONERS:- -------------------------
1. MOOSAN S/O.MUHAMMED, KAROTHUKUDY HOUSE, KANDANTHARA ALLAPRA P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
2. SALIM, CHIRAYILAN HOUSE, KANDANTHARA, ALLAPRA P.O.
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
3. NASAR P.A., PUTHUKKADAN HOUSE, KANDANTHARA, ALLAPRA P.O.
ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.ALI SRI.A.MUHAMMED HASHIM RESPONDENTS:- -------------------------
1. DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER KSEB, PERUMBAVOOR DIVISION, PERUMBAVOOR ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 943
2. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, KSEB, VENGOLA SECTION, VENGOLA ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN - 683 943 BY ADV. SRI.K.M.SATHYANATHA MENON, SC, KSEB THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 22503 of 2014 (K) ----------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. PHOTOCOPY OF THE APPLICATION DATED 03.08.2013. EXHIBIT P2. PHOTOCOPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.281190 DATED 07.09.2013. EXHIBIT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 09.01.2014. EXHIBIT P4. TRUE COPY OF THE NO OBJECTION CERTIFICATE DATED 02.08.13. EXHIBIT P5 PHOTOGRAPHS OF ELECTRIC POST WITHOUT THE SUPPORT OF STAY WIRES EXHIBIT P6 PHOTOCOPY OF THE SKETCH RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:- EXHIBIT R1(a) COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 06.12.2013 SENT BY THE BOARD TO THE SECRETARY, KANDANTHARA MUSLIM JAMA ATH EXHIBIT R1(b) COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 20.04.2014 SENT BY THE GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE KANDANTHARA MUSLIM JAMA ATH TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT R1(c) COPY OF THE SAID ESTIMATE PREPARED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
/TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE
V. CHITAMBARESH, J W.P.(C). NO. 22503 OF 2014 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 09th day of February, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioners seek shifting of the electricity supply line drawn over their property. Ext.P3 representation dated 09.01.2014 is pending consideration with the first respondent. The petitioners have also produced Ext. P6 sketch to buttress their contention that the route is economically viable and technically feasible.
2.
I direct the first respondent to consider Ext. P3 representation with notice to the petitioners. The needful shall be done within a period of one month from the date of production of a copy of this judgment.
The writ petition is disposed of.
V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE