← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/26157/2010dismissed as infructuous

Rajan v. The Dist. Collector And Others

2015-08-17Honourable Mr. Justice Dama Seshadri Naidu3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/26TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 26157 of 2010 (T) ------------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

RAJAN, S/O.APPU, SREEJITH BHAVAN, TC-63/1289, POONTHURA P.O., AMBALATHARA DESOM, MUTTATHARA VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAUPRAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.M.G.KARTHIKEYAN SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENTS:

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR/DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REP.BY SECRETARY, TAXES(A)DEPARTMENT, GOVT.SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

3. THE EXCISE COMMISSIONER, COMMISSIONERATE OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

5. G.RAJMOHAN NAIR, TC-48/1097, AMBALATHARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 522.

6. THE HEAD MISTRESS, GOVT.U.P.S., AMBALATHARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 522.

7. K.GANGADHARAN NAIR, ARA 51-A, PRESIDENT, AMBALATHARA RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION, REG.NO.T-1396/98, AMBALATHARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 522.

8. THE PRESIDENT & SECRETARY AMBALATHARA EAST-WEST RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION, REG.NO.T.2646/2000, AMALATHARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 522.

9. E.NOOHUKANNU, PRESIDENT, AMBALATHARRA THOTTAM RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION, REG.NO.1145/96, AMBALATHARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 522.

10. J.C.RAJAN CHETTIYAR, PRESIDENT, VIKAS NAGAR RESIDENCE ASSOCIATION, REG.NO.243/48, AMBALATHARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 522.

11. THE PUBLIC RELATIONS OFFICER, AL-ARIF HOSPITAL, AMBALATHARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 522.

R5, R7, R10, R11 BY ADVS. SRI.B.SATHIQ SRI.C.ANIRUDHAN R1-4 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.G.GOPAKUMAR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Dama Seshadri Naidu, J.

------------------------------------------- W.P.(C)No.26157 of 2010 T -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of August, 2015

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Recording the said submission, this Court dismisses the writ petition as having become infructuous.

Dama Seshadri Naidu, Judge tkv