← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22308/2015disposed of

M.V.Ambujakshan v. Kerala State Road Transport Corporation

2015-07-24Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH FRIDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JULY 2015/2ND SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22308 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- M.V.AMBUJAKSHAN, AGED 57 YEARS S/O.SRI. VANDY, RETIRED INSPECTOR, KSRTC ERNAKULAM, RESIDING AT MATHEPADATH HOUSE KAITHARAM P.O, NORTH PARAVOOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT. BY ADVS.SRI.T.P.PRADEEP ADV.SRI.P.K.SATHEESH KUMAR RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 001.

2. THE DISTRICT TRANSPORT OFFICER KSRTC, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI 35.

BY SRI.M.GOPIKRISHNAN NAMBIAR, SC, KSRTC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 22308 of 2015 (K) -------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. COPY OF THE PENSION PAYMENT ORDER (NO.49118) EXHIBIT P2. COPY OF THE GAZETTE NOTIFICATION PUBLISHED ON 5.11.09. EXHIBIT P3.

COPY OF THE CIRCULAR MEMORANDUM DATED 6.7.10. EXHIBIT P4.

COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC 14191/13 AND CONNECTED CASES DATED 1.7.13.

EXHIBIT P5. COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION SUBMITTED ON 20.6.15. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:-NIL --------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 22308 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 24th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner seeks re-fixation of the qualifying service and the disbursement of consequential benefits. Ext. P4 judgment in W.P.(C). No. 14191/2013 of this Court is relied on. Ext. P5 representation put in by the petitioner is pending. The same requires to be dealt with in the light of Ext. P4 judgment.

2.

I direct the first respondent to consider Ext. P5 representation within a period of two months. The same shall be done with notice to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE