High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22324/2015closed

Naseera Aneesh v. The Director General Of Police

2015-09-034 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BABU MATHEW P.JOSEPH THURSDAY, THE 3RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/12TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22324 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

-------------------------- NASEERA ANEESH AGED 37 YEARS W/O.A.J.ANEESH, MELEPURAYIL, MANGARAM KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.S.SHANAVAS KHAN SMT.S.INDU RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, KERALA.

2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (NODA OFFICER) KUBERA OPRATIONS, PATHANAMTHITTA.

3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA.

4. NAJEEM T.K.

S/O.KAREEM SAHIB, THANGUMMOOTTIL PEEDIKAYIL, MANGARAM KONNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

R4 BY ADV. SRI.C.P.SAJI R4 BY ADV. SMT.P.DEEPA MOHAN R1-R3 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.M.MADHUBEN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 03-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 22324 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 2/7/2015 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT P2. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 16/7/2015 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT P3. TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 16/7/2015 PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL --------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE

BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, J.

-------------------------------------- W.P.(C).No.22324 of 2015 ------------------------------------- Dated this the 3rd day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH, J.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in view of the fact that Crime No.1198/2015 of Konni Police Station has been registered by the 3rd respondent incorporating the offence under Section 384 of IPC against the 4th respondent, the grievance of the petitioner is redressed. Therefore, she prays for closing this writ petition. In view of the submission so made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is closed.

Sd/- BABU MATHEW P. JOSEPH JUDGE //TRUE COPY// PA TO JUDGE