High Court of KeralaWP(C)/25014/2013disposed of

P.P.Ayisha Lainakakalillath v. The State Of Kerala

2015-01-06Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/16TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 25014 of 2013 (B) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

----------------- P.P.AYISHA LAINAKAKALILLATH W/O P.K. RAZAK, RESIDING AT PAKKAM, BELUR VILLAGE, HOSDURG TALUK, P.O. PADIMARATHU.

BY ADVS.SRI.T.SETHUMADHAVAN SRI.PUSHPARAJAN KODOTH SRI.K.JAYESH MOHANKUMAR SMT.VANDANA MENON RESPONDENTS:

------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO PUBLIC WORK DEPARTMENT TRIVANDRUM.

2. SPECIAL TAHSILDAR (LAND ACQUISITION) (GENERAL), KASARAGOD.

3. SECRETARY KODOM BELUR PANCHAYATH, KASARAGOD.

R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.T.R.RAJESH THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 25014 of 2013 (B) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ----------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION UNDER SEC.28A OF THE LAND ACQUISITION ACT FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND ` RESPONDENT DATED 25.8.09.

EXHIBIT P2: TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 14.3.2011 IN LAA NOS. 16, 485& 489 OF 2010 & C.S. NOS. 10 & 77 OF 2011 ON THE FILE OF THIS HON'BLE COURT.

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY FO THE ORDER DATED 3.9.2013 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S) EXHIBITS : NIL.

------------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE.

V.CHITAMBARESH, J.

--------------------- W.P (C) No.25014 of 2013 --------------------- Dated this the 6th day of January, 2015

J U D G M E N T

It is brought out that Ext.P3 order impugned in this writ petition has already been set aside in W.P (C) No.25020/2013 and connected cases. The same reasons will follow and the Land Acquisition Officer is accordingly directed to consider Ext.P1 application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 in accordance with law. Needless to say that the petitioner shall be put on notice and heard before final orders are passed afresh.

The Writ Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- V.CHITAMBARESH, Judge.

nj.