C.A.Mohamood v. Tahsildar, Kasaragod
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/21ST JYAISHTA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22596 of 2014 (Y) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------------- C.A.MOHAMOOD, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O. HASSANKUTTY, PWD CONTRACTOR, PULIKKUNNU KASARAGOD - 671 121.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN SRI.JAYANANDAN MADAYI PUTHIYAVEETTIL SRI.P.SAJU RESPONDENT(S):
-------------------------
1. TAHSILDAR, REVENUE RECOVERY, KASARAGOD - 671 121.
2. VILLAGE OFFICER THALANGARA, KASARAGOD - 671 121.
3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, P.W.D ROADS DIVISION, KANNUR - 670 001.
4. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.M.T.SHEEBA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: PJ
WP(C).No. 22596 of 2014 (Y) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 01/07/2004 IN W.P(C) 17701/2013 EXHIBIT-P2TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 14/04/2014 ADDRESSED TO THE IST RESPONDENT BY THE PETITIONER.
EXHIBIT-P2(A)-TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL ACKNOWLEDGMENT. EXHIBIT-P3TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 11/08/2014 OF 3RD RESPONDENT TO THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER WITH CALCULATIONS. EXHIBIT-P4TRUE COPY OF THE R.R PROCEEDINGS INITIATED BY THE IST RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- EXHIBIT R3(A): TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.CE/R & B/KNR/7475/2004 DT.8/11/12 EXHIBIT R3(B): TRUE COPY OF THE RELEVANT PAGES OF THE INSPECTION REPORT DATED 7/3/14 / TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ
A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.
******************************************************* W.P.(C) No.22596 of 2014 ******************************************************* Dated this the 11th day of June, 2015
JUDGMENT
The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 demand notice under Section 7 of the Revenue Recovery Act. The demand notice is for Rs.46,49,266/- 2.
It is submitted by the learned Government Pleader that the demand is now being varied and new proposal is made. In that view of the matter, Ext.P4 is quashed and it is open for the petitioner to challenge any further proceedings if fresh demand is made.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln