← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22490/2015disposed of

Shaina v. The Regional Transport Authority, Ernakulam

2015-07-29Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2015/7TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22490 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- PETITIONERS:

------------

1. SHAINA, AGED 38 YEARS W/O.SAJI, HOUSE NO.2/706, VAZHVELI HOUSE VALLUVALLY, KOONAMMAVU PO, NORTH PARUR

2. ABHILASH S/O.SADANANDAN, VELIYATH HOUSE, SOUTH ADUVASSERY NORTH PARUR BY ADV. SRI.K.V.GOPINATHAN NAIR RESPONDENTS:

------------

1. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, PIN 682030

2. THE SECRETARY REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682030 R BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 22490 of 2015 (I) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ P1:TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT HOLDING BY THE 1ST PETITIONER ON THE ROUTE KOTTUVALLY- MALAVANA FERRY VALID UP TO 31.12.2014 P2:TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT HOLDING BY THE 2ND PETITONER ON THE ROUTE NORTH PARUR- ANGAMALY VALID UP TO 08.11.2014 P3:TRUE COPY OF THE RENEWAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 04.12.2014 P4:TRUE COPY OF THE RENEWAL APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 08.08.2014 RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS: NIL ---------------------- TRUE COPY PA TO JUDGE Scl.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 22490 of 2015 -------------------------------------- Dated this the 29th day of July, 2015.

JUDGMENT

The petitioners are seeking a direction to the respondents to consider Exts. P3 and P4 statutory applications for renewal in the next meeting of the RTA.

2.

Petitioners are holding regular permits. Petitioners alleges that before the expiry of the existing regular permit, they submitted Exts.P3 and P4 applications for renewal of regular permit within the statutory period itself. After submission of Exts. P3 and P4, though there was so many meetings of the first respondent, the application submitted by the petitioners were not included for consideration so far. It is with this background, the petitioners have come up before this Court.

3.

I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Senior Government Pleader in the matter. 4.

The learned Senior Government Pleader on

W.P.(C) No. 22490 of 2015 -2instructions would submit that the next RTA meeting is scheduled to be held on 6.8.2015.

Therefore, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to include Exts.P3 and P4 applications for renewal in the meeting scheduled to be held on 6.8.2015 and pass orders on the same in that meeting itself without any fail. Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE Scl.