← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22501/2015disposed of

George Thomas v. The Secretary

2015-07-27Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2015/5TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22501 of 2015 (K) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- GEORGE THOMAS, ST. THOMAS TRAVELS, KODIMATHA, KOTTAYAM.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT :

--------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, IDUKKI-685 603 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).NO.22501/2015 APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:

P1 COPY OF THE TIME SCHEDULE WITH WHICH PETITIONER IS OPERATING ON THE ROUTE CHEMPAKAPPARA- CHANGANACHERRY.

P2 COPY OF THE PERMIT VALID TILL 1/11/2015 ON THE ROUTE CHEMPAKAPPARA- CHANGANACHERRY.

P3 COPY OF THE REQUEST SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED 10/6/2015.

RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:

NIL /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 22501 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 27th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Seeking a direction to the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3, which was submitted by the petitioner for revision of own timings, the petitioner has come up before this Court. 2.

The petitioner is operating service on the route between Chempakappara and Changanacherry with his stage carriage bearing Reg.No.KL-58/E-1899 with a set of timings settled initially on 14.01.2006 by the respondent. The petitioner filed Ext.P3 application for revision of timings of his service.

Aggrieved by the non consideration of Ext.P3 by the respondent, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader in the matter. Considering the nature of the prayer, the writ

W.P.(C) No. 22501 of 2015 ..2..

petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider and pass appropriate orders on Ext.P3 after affording the petitioner and the affected parties, if any, an opportunity of being heard, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition before the respondent at the earliest.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-