Joseph Francis v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN MONDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JULY 2015/5TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22523 of 2015 (M) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
--------------------------
1. JOSEPH FRANCIS, S/O.FRANCIS, MATTATHIL HOUSE, KADAMPAZHIPURAM, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2. FOUSIYA, W/O.MUHAMMEDKUTTY, PALLATH HOUSE, EZHUVANTHALA, NELLAYA, OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYARAM.
RESPONDENT(S):
----------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, PALAKKAD-678 001.
3. THE TAHSILDAR, OTTAPALAM-679 101.
4. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, AMBALAPPARA-II VILLAGE, PIN-679 512.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT.C.K. SHERIN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rs.
WP(C).No. 22523 of 2015 (M) APPENDIX PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:- EXT. P1 :
TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.5106/2010 SRO OTTAPALAM. EXT. P2 :
TRUE COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.1514/2012 SRO, OTTAPALAM EXT. P3 :
TRUE COPY OF THE COMPROMISE ENTERED INTO AMONGST PETITIONERS AND OTHERS IN OS.131/2012 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.
EXT. P4 :
TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DTD. 30-7-2013 IN OS.131/2012 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.
EXT. P5 :
TRUE COPY OF THE DECREE DTD. 30-07-2013 IN OS.131/12 ON THE FILES OF MUNSIFF COURT, OTTAPALAM.
EXT. P6 :
TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION DTD. 23-3-2015 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 3RD RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S EXHIBITS:- NIL.
//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE rs.
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 22523 of 2015 (M) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 27th day of July, 2015
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has, by Ext.P6 dated 23.03.2015, requested for mutation on the strength of Ext.P3 settlement deed in a suit and for acceptance of land tax. 2.
Considering the confined prayer, the 3rd respondent shall consider the application and pass orders in it, at any rate within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of.
Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj