High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22682/2015disposed of

M.V.Narayanan v. The Secretary, Mulanthuruthy Grama Panchayath

2015-09-08Honourable Mr.Justice V.Chitambaresh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH TUESDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/17TH BHADRA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22682 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------- PETITIONER:

-------------------------- M.V.NARAYANAN, AGED 59 YEARS S/O.M.K.VELAYUDHAN, MAYYAMPILLIL HOUSE, VATTUKUNNU MULANTHURUTHY.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.R.VINOD MS.JENCY SUSAN JOSE SRI.V.SRI NATH RESPONDENTS:

----------------------------

1. THE SECRETARY, MULANTHURUTHY GRAMA PANCHAYATH MULATHURUTHY, 682 314.

2. BABU C. MALAYAN, AGED ABOUT 50 S/O.CHARLIE, ULLATTIL MALAYAN HOUSE, VATTUKUNNU MULANTHURUTHY 682 314.

R1 BY ADVS. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR (SR.) SRI.P.MARTIN JOSE SRI.P.PRIJITH SRI.THOMAS P.KURUVILLA R2 BY ADVS. SRI.T.B.THANKAPPAN SRI.T.T.HARIKUMAR SRI.ASHISH VIDYADHARAN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 22682 of 2015 (I) ------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1. COPY OF THE COMPLAINT LODGED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 14.7.14.

EXHIBIT P2. COPY OF THE ORDER OF THE SUB COLLECTOR, FORT KOCHI DATED 11.11.14.

EXHIBIT P3. COPY OF THE NOTICE ISSUED TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT BY THE IST RESPONDENT DATED 3.2.15.

EXHIBIT P4. COPY OF THE NOTICE DATED 19.3.15 ISSUED BY THE IST RESPONDENT IN FAVOUR OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS::- --------------------------------------- EXHIBIT R2(a).

COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 25.03.2015 ISSUED BY 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE SECRETARY MULAMTHURUTHY PANCHAYATH EXHIBIT R2(b).

COPY OF THE APPEAL DATED 16.02.2015 BEFORE THE RDO, FOR KOCHI /TRUE COPY/ P.A. TO JUDGE

V. CHITAMBARESH, J --------------------------------------- W.P.(C). NO. 22682 OF 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 8th day of September, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner relies on Exts. P3 and P4 orders passed by the first respondent pursuant to Ext. P2 order of the Revenue Divisional Officer. It is for the Panchayath Committee to take appropriate steps in this regard as held in Raj Kumar v. Mathaikutty [2013 (1) KLT 512].

Any motion made by the petitioner in this regard before the Panchayath Committee within two weeks from today shall be dealt with within a period of two weeks therefrom. Needless to say that the petitioner as well as the second respondent shall be put on notice and heard in the exercise.

The writ petition is disposed of.

V. CHITAMBARESH JUDGE