High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22778/2015disposed of

Dr.Ali v. The General Manager

2015-07-28Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE TUESDAY, THE 28TH DAY OF JULY 2015/6TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22778 of 2015 (V) --------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

---------------------- DR.ALI, S/O.MOHAMMED KUTTY HAJI, KOTTAKKARAN HOUSE, OTHUKKUNGAL, MATTATHOOR, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.K.RAKESH RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- 1.

THE GENERAL MANAGER, OFFICE OF THE GENERAL MANAGER TELECOM, DOWN-HILL, MALAPPURAM-676505.

THE ACCOUNT OFFICER, BHARATH SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-676505.

BY ADVS. SRI.K.S.MANU, SC, BSNL SRI.MATHEWS K.PHILIP,SC, BSNL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 28-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

WP(C).No. 22778 of 2015 (V) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT-P1TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE 2ND RESPONDENT DATED 22/6/2015 EXHIBIT-P2TRUE COPY OF THE LETTER SENT BY THE PETITIONER TO THE R2 DATED 3/7/15 EXHIBIT-P3TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINANT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE R2 DATED 23/7/15.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS --------------------------------------- NIL.

/ TRUE COPY / P.S. TO JUDGE PJ

A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

-------------------------------------------- W.P(C). No. 22778 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 28th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

Petitioner has approached this Court on account of barring outgoing facility of his landline connection provided by Bharath Sanchar Nigam Limited. Petitioner's case is that, though he has requested the respondents to issue bills, they are not issuing bills time to time. Therefore he did not remit the amount for want of bills. 2.

Learned counsel for the respondents submits that they already served bills by post. According to the respondents only 1014/- is due from the petitioner and on account of non-payment they ₹ have barred the outgoing facility.

Considering the facts and circumstances, following directions are issued:

(i) The respondents shall issue all the bills in the address shown in the writ petition.

(ii) The respondent shall restore the outgoing service of the landline connection immediately on payment of the amount due. (iii) Respondents shall serve the bill for the month of June 2015, by post immediately.

This writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- A. MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE.