High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22839/2015disposed of

Parameswaran Nair v. Kerala State Pollution Control Board

2015-08-05Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/14TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22839 of 2015 (D) ---------------------------- PETITIONER:

------------------- PARAMESWARAN NAIR, PROPRIETOR, M/S. VEENA CRUSHER, MALAYAM P.O, NEYYATTINKARA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.BECHU KURIAN THOMAS SRI.ENOCH DAVID SIMON JOEL RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRICT OFFICE, PATTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.

REPRESENTED BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER.

2. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER, KERALA STATE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, DISTRIT OFFICE, PATTOM P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 004.

BY SRI. M.AJAY, SC THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

WP(C).No. 22839 of 2015 (D) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:

------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1.

TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT ISSUED BY THE POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD FOR CARRYING OUT QUARRYING OPERATIONS VALID TILL 30.1.15.

EXHIBIT P2.

TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.

RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:

NIL.

//TRUE COPY// P.S. TO JUDGE mbr/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 22839 of 2015 (D) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Ext.P2 application for renewal of consent to operate a quarrying unit, which the petitioner is said to have applied for. 2.

In such circumstances, the Ext.P2 application of the petitioner shall be considered after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, and a decision shall be taken within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this judgment, if necessary after conducting a physical inspection. If there is any objection raised, the objectors also shall be heard.

The writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj