High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22844/2015disposed of

Roy Oommachan v. Canara Bank

2015-07-29Honourable Mr. Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE WEDNESDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2015/7TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22844 of 2015 (E) ---------------------------- PETITIONER :

----------------------- ROY OOMMACHAN, AGED 37 YEARS, S/O.OOMMACHAN.A, RESIDING AT JOY HOUSE, TC 15/2824, MADATHUVILAOM LANE, PATOOR, TRIVANDRUM.

BY ADVS.SRI.ANTO THOMAS SRI.P.S.SISHOY RESPONDENT(S):

----------------------------

1. CANARA BANK, HAVING HEAD OFFICE AT 112, JC ROAD, BANGALORE-2 AND BRANCHES AMONG OTHER PLACES AT PUTHENCHANTHA, TRIVANDRUM, REPRESENTED BY ITS BRANCH MANAGER, CANARA BANK, PUTHENCHANTHA BRANCH, TRIVANDRUM -695 001.

2. JEEVAN.R.,AGED 33 YEARS, S/O.RAMACHANDRAN, RESIDING AT SNRA -184, VALANIDHI, PIPINMOODU, SASTHAMANGALAM P.O.,THIRUVANANTHAPURAM- 695 010. R1 BY SRI.P.GOPINATH MENON, SC, CANARA BANK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

WP(C).No. 22844 of 2015 (E) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1.

COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS 1096/11 PENDING BEFORE THE SUB COURT, TRIVANDRUM.

EXHIBIT P2.

COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 3.7.15 PREFERRED BEFORE THE IST RESPONDENT.

EXHIBIT P3.

COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT DATED 3.7.15.

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

NIL ----------------------------------------- /TRUE COPY/ P.A.TO JUDGE sts

A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, J.

***************************************************************************** W.P.(C) No. 22844 of 2015 ****************************************************************************** Dated this the 29th day of July, 2015

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a guarantor of the loan availed by the second respondent. The petitioner approached the Bank with One Time Settlement proposal as per Ext.P2. The petitioner's only prayer before this Court is that the Bank may be directed to consider Ext.P2 representation.

In view of the above, the Bank is directed to consider Ext.P2 representation within one month and communicate the decision to the petitioner.

The writ petition is disposed of as above.

Sd/- A.MUHAMED MUSTAQUE, JUDGE ln