V.O.Daniel v. District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/14TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22893 of 2015 (J) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S) :

--------------------------

1. V.O.DANIEL AGED 78 YEARS, VALIYAVILAYIL HOUSE, KALANJOOR MURI & VILLAGE KALANJOOR P.O., ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.

2. MARIAMMA DANIEL AGED 66 YEARS, VALIYAVILAYIL HOUSE, KALANJOOR MURI & VILLAGE KALANJOOR P.O., PATHANAMTHITTA.

BY ADVS.SRI.JACOB P. ALEX SRI.JOSEPH P. ALEX RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, CIVIL STATION PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN-689 645.

2. THASILDAR TALUK OFFICE, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA-689 645.

3. V.MOHANAN NAIR S/O. VASUKUTTAN NAIR, VILAYIL VEEDU KALANJOOR MURI & VILLAGE, ADOOR TALUK PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT-689 645.

R1 & R2 BY GOVT. PLEADER SMT. C.K. SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Mn ...2/-

WP(C).No. 22893 of 2015 (J) --------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONERS' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------- EXT. P1 :

COPY OF THE REVISION PETITION DTD.23.12.2011 FILED BY THE PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT. P2 :

COPY OF THE PLAINT IN OS NO.70 OF 2012 BEFORE THE SUB COURT, PATHANAMTHITTA.

EXT. P3 :

COPY OF THE NOTICE BEARING NO.C3-17281/11(1) DTD.14.8.2013 ISSUED FROM THE OFFICE OF 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT. P4 :

COPY OF THE REPLY DTD.24.8.2013 TO EXT.P3 SUBMITTED ON BEHALF OF PETITIONERS BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL ----------------------------------------------------------- //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

------------------------------------------ W.P.(C) No. 22893 of 2015 (J) ------------------------------------------ Dated this the 5th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioners' grievance seems to be that Ext.P1 revision filed on 23.12.2011has not been considered till date by the 1st respondent.

2.

Considering the confined prayer made, there shall be a direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P1 revision, if still pending, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioners.

The Writ Petition is disposed of with the above observation.

Sd/- K.VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE jjj