Puthiya Paramban Raseeth @ Rasheed v. Pinarayi Grama Panchayath
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU WEDNESDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/17TH POUSHA, 1936 WP(C).No. 23149 of 2014 (P) ---------------------------- PETITIONER(S):
---------------- PUTHIYA PARAMBAN RASEETH @ RASHEED, AGED 53 YEARS S/O.LATE C.H MAMMOOTTY NOW RESIDING AT THAYYULATHIL HOUSE, POYANAD MAMBRAM P.O, THALASSERY, KANNUR DISTRICT BY ADVS.SRI.C.P.PEETHAMBARAN SMT.MINI.V.A.
RESPONDENT(S):
--------------
1. PINARAYI GRAMA PANCHAYATH PINARAYI P.O, KANNUR DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
2. THE SECRETARY PINARAYI GRAMA PANCHAYAT, PINARAYI P.O KANNUR DISTRICT R1-R2 BY ADV. SRI.P.NARAYANAN, STANDING COUNSEL THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 23149 of 2014 (P) ---------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------ EXHIBIT P1 : TRUE COPY OF THE DOCUMENT NO 2077/2012 OF SUB REGISTRAR OFFICE,KADIRUR EXHIBIT P2 : TRUE COPY OF THE RELEASE DEED DATED 29/4/1982 OF SRO, KADIRUR EXHIBIT P3 : TRUE PHOTOTOGRAPH OF THE PROPERTY REFERRED IN EXHIBITS P-1 AND P2 EXHIBIT P4 : TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT DATED 17/1/2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT EXHIBIT P5 : TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19/6/2014 IN WPC NO 14452/2014 OF THIS HON'BLE COURT EXHIBIT P6 : TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR PEERMIT DATED 25/6/2014 ALONG WITH THE OTHER DOCUMENTS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENTS EXHIBIT P7 : TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 25/7/2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS NIL ------------------------ //TRUE COPY// P.A TO JUDGE vdv
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
========================= W.P(C) No.23149 of 2014 ============================ Dated this the 07th day of January, 2015
JUDGMENT
In the light of the ratio laid down in the judgment dated 13.10.2011 in W.P.(C) No.16463 of 2010, this Court disposes of the present writ petition on the same lines, quashing Ext.P7 order.
2. Consequently, the respondent Gramapanchayath is directed to consider the application for building permission submitted by the petitioner and pass appropriate orders thereon, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The petitioner shall produce a copy of the judgment along with a copy of the writ petition before the respondent for further action.
Sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE vdv //True Copy// P.A to Judge