High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22987/2015dismissed

V.Sujith Kumar v. The Director General Of Police

2015-08-06Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/15TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22987 of 2015 (W) -------------------------------------- PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- V.SUJITH KUMAR, AGED 40 YEARS, ADVOCATE, S/O. T.K.VASU, 1ST FLOOR, CHANDRA BUILDINGS, EAST OF KAT, VANCHIYOOR P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.K.RAJESH KANNAN RESPONDENT(S):

--------------------------

1. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 014.

2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE (RURAL), THIRUVANANTHAPURAM RURAL, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 003.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.C.K.SHERIN THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

WP(C).No. 22987 of 2015 (W) ---------------------------------------- APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS ------------------------------------- P1 -TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT DT. 25.6.2015.

P2 - TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT FOR EXT.P1. P3 - TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD FOR EXT. P1. P4 - TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT WAS SUBMITTED BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT DT. 25.6.2015.

P5 - TRUE COPY OF THE POSTAL RECEIPT FOR EXT. P4. P6 - TRUE COPY OF THE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD FOR EXT. P4. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS:

----------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.S.TO JUDGE Msv/

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.

===================== W.P.(C) No.22987 of 2015 - W ====================== Dated this the 6th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the non-consideration of Exts.P1 and P4 complaints filed before the 2nd respondent. The complaint obviously is against a Circle Inspector of Police, who has not been made a party herein. In such circumstance, the writ petition is not maintainable for reason of the proper parties not having been impleaded.

The writ petition would stand dismissed with liberty to file a fresh writ petition.

Sd/- K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE SB // true copy // P.A to Judge.