← Library
High Court of KeralaWP(C)/22992/2015disposed of

Mohamed Mustafa v. The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Palakkad

2015-07-30Honourable Mr. Justice A.V.Ramakrishna Pillai4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI THURSDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JULY 2015/8TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 22992 of 2015 (Y) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------ MOHAMMED MUSTHAFA, KOONATHIL HOUSE, THRIKKANAPURAM P.O., MALAPPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.I.DINESH MENON RESPONDENT(S):

---------------------------- THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, PALAKKAD, PIN-678 001.

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT.K.A.SANJEETHA THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 22992 of 2015 (Y) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

----------------------------------------- EXHIBIT P1: TRUE COPY OF THE REGULAR PERMIT ON THE ROUTE EDAPPALPATTAMBI. EXHIBIT P2: THE TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR RENEWAL OF THE PERMIT ON THE ROUTE EDAPPAL-PATTAMBI.

EXHIBIT P3: TRUE COPY OF THE APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY PERMIT ON THE ROUTE EDAPPAL-PATTAMBI.

EXHIBIT P4: THE TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT EVIDENCING PAYMENT OF REQUISITE FEE.

EXHIBIT P5: TRUE COPY OF THE CONSENT ISSUED BY THE PERMIT HOLDER. RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J.

-------------------------------------------------- W.P.(C) No. 22992 of 2015 -------------------------------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of July, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved by the non issue of temporary permit, pending consideration of the renewal application of the regular permit and on consent being given by the basic permit holder.

2.

The petitioner has applied for temporary permit on the route between Edappal and Pattambi in place of stage carriage bearing Reg.No.KL-12/A-9393. The petitioner alleges that the basic permit expired on 01.06.2014 and the renewal application is pending. As the basic permit holder has not applied for temporary permit, with the consent of the basic permit holder, the petitioner applied for temporary permit vide Ext.P3. As Ext.P3 has not been considered so far, the petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondent for a disposal of Ext.P3.

W.P.(C) No. 22992 of 2015 ..2..

3.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Pleader in the matter. Considering the nature of the relief, the writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent to consider Ext.P3 and issue temporary permit as prayed for, within a period of two weeks.

To facilitate an early action, the petitioner shall be at liberty to produce a copy of this judgment as well as a copy of this writ petition before the respondent at the earliest.

Sd/- A.V. RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI JUDGE bka/-