High Court of KeralaWP(C)/23128/2015disposed of

Puthusseril Granites (Pvt) Ltd v. The Additional Tahzildar

2015-08-07Honourable Mr.Justice K.Vinod Chandran3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN FRIDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2015/16TH SRAVANA, 1937 WP(C).No. 23128 of 2015 (M) ------------------------------------------ PETITIONER(S) :

------------------------- PUTHUSSERIL GRANITES (PVT) LTD., REPRESENTED BY NIXON JOHN, MANAGING DIRECTOR, PUTHUSSERIL GRANITES (PVT) LTD., KALTHIPACHA, PALLIKKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.G.BHAGAVAT SINGH RESPONDENT(S) :

----------------------------

1. THE ADDITIONAL TAHZILDAR, VARKALA TALUK, VARKALA P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

2. THE VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLIKKAL VILLAGE OFFICE, PALLIKKAL P.O., THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY SR.GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.BIJU MEENATTOR THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 07-08-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

Msd.

WP(C).No. 23128 of 2015 (M) ------------------------------------------ APPENDIX PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS :

---------------------------------------- EXT.P1:

COPY OF THE SALE DEED NO.1654/2014 DATED 17/09/2014 OF THE NAVAYIKKULAM, SRO.

EXT.P2:

COPY OF THE THANDAPER ACCOUNT OF SHINOD.

EXT.P3:

COPY OF THE RECEIPT J NO.1164116 DATED 15/11/2014 ISSUED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT.

EXT.P4:

COPY OF THE REPORT DATED 15/06/2015 SUBMITTED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT TO THE 1ST RESPONDENT RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS :

------------------------------------------- NIL //TRUE COPY// P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - W.P(C) No.23128 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 07th day of August, 2015

J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with the fact that the petitioner's application for mutation which is said to have been received as evidenced at Ext.P3 is not considered. The learned Government Pleader, on instruction submits that a report has been called for from the Village Officer and the Village Officer sought for a clarification from the 1st respondent and the matter would be considered immediately on such clarification being issued. In such circumstance, the Village Officer shall endeavor to obtain clarification immediately and consider the application immediately thereafter; at any rate, within three months from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this judgment. Writ petition is disposed of.

Sd/- (K. VINOD CHANDRAN, JUDGE) jma //true copy// P.A to Judge